This week, the plaintiffs in a case that claimed that Trump University was a sham, a money-making scheme in which they were not offered education for their money, but false hope, decided to settle. Accepting half their money back. I don't know enough of the details, but the timing is critical to understanding the motivations and behavior of our future President of these United States. Getting half your money back may seem to be some consolation, but when you go into the marketplace to buy anything from a loaf of bread to a car, if it was rotten inside or would not perform as advertised, you would get all of your money back, without question.
This says far more about the defendant than about the 3500 plus lawsuits that the President-elect faces. This one suit involves about 7 thousands of individuals who collectively paid over fifty million dollars to this fake "school". Now some say that the buyer is to beware, but the courts term what the institution did was fraud and the future President and his managers faced federal racketeering charges as well. I would say that giving half the money back to make these two particular lawsuits "go away" constitutes another sort of fraud altogether.
The fact that this sort of legal "protection", being able to give your customers half their money back, when your "product" was worthless to begin with, presents a clear case for not allowing criminals to run businesses. The Attorney General of Florida, who stalled the case there against The Donald, until after the election, is now being offered a cabinet level position. This is dangerously suggestive of criminality. If you tried to craft a scheme of deception, collusion and deceitful side-stepping of laws that was more heinous, it would be hard to do. In the end, we have bad actors working in concert to get what they want at the expense of thousands of others. Perhaps tens of thousands of us will be hurt financially by these sorts of dealings. In the end, the whole nation suffers from the legal wrangling and exploitative ways of one man and his very powerful "friends".
Never mistake that this was not planned in advance, precipitated by wanton greed and/or facilitated by the cozy relationships that our future President buys outright. I would not want to step aside and allow a criminal to continue to get away with hurting people. I would not want to settle for half what I am rightfully owed. In this case, at least we are shown the true colors of this particular snake in the grass.
This says far more about the defendant than about the 3500 plus lawsuits that the President-elect faces. This one suit involves about 7 thousands of individuals who collectively paid over fifty million dollars to this fake "school". Now some say that the buyer is to beware, but the courts term what the institution did was fraud and the future President and his managers faced federal racketeering charges as well. I would say that giving half the money back to make these two particular lawsuits "go away" constitutes another sort of fraud altogether.
The fact that this sort of legal "protection", being able to give your customers half their money back, when your "product" was worthless to begin with, presents a clear case for not allowing criminals to run businesses. The Attorney General of Florida, who stalled the case there against The Donald, until after the election, is now being offered a cabinet level position. This is dangerously suggestive of criminality. If you tried to craft a scheme of deception, collusion and deceitful side-stepping of laws that was more heinous, it would be hard to do. In the end, we have bad actors working in concert to get what they want at the expense of thousands of others. Perhaps tens of thousands of us will be hurt financially by these sorts of dealings. In the end, the whole nation suffers from the legal wrangling and exploitative ways of one man and his very powerful "friends".
Never mistake that this was not planned in advance, precipitated by wanton greed and/or facilitated by the cozy relationships that our future President buys outright. I would not want to step aside and allow a criminal to continue to get away with hurting people. I would not want to settle for half what I am rightfully owed. In this case, at least we are shown the true colors of this particular snake in the grass.
No comments:
Post a Comment